How do surgeons handle it when patients refuse to remove underwear before surgery, and why is it such a big deal?

 

Thomas Cayne

·

Follow

Writer, painter, thinker, madman. Sep 19

How do surgeons handle it when patients refuse to remove underwear before surgery, and why is it such a big deal?

It’s not about you.

It’s not about your genitals, your pubic hair or the pimples down there. It’s not about the size and looks of your labia, the many smells or the finger prints your lover left behind. It’s not about you.

It’s about the medical problem that has to be solved.

It could be a cancer, a bladder infection, a big bad mold, smelly cats, pregnancy-gone-wrong, a baby that stopped kicking, something itchy-and-scratchy, a rectal thing (been there, done unfortunately that) — you name it, but it needs to be solved.

And if your underwear needs to be removed for whatever reason, you can refuse all you want — it will be removed anyway. So you might look the other way and wait until you are sedated, or stop being hypocritical and remove your undies all the same. The only thing you are doing through your refusal is attracting attention, and so most probably the entire OR staff will have a good look while you are fast asleep to see what is so special down there.

And yes, those labia are humongous —

But they saw even bigger ones just the week before.

---

SOURCES: Internet Archive Book Images, No restrictions, via Wikimedia Commons.

748.8K views

View 214 upvotes

View 6 shares

What is cancer? Why is there really no cure but only slowing down its process?

 Copy from Quora Author VitalSign for studying and researching purposes

VitalSign

·

Following

Answering your health questions3h

What is cancer? Why is there really no cure but only slowing down its process?

The ultimate barrier to curing cancer is a chilling biological reality: the disease isn't an external invader, but a microscopic rebellion orchestrated by your own body.

A bacterium or virus has distinct alien proteins that medications can target. 

Cancer cells are the patient's own cells that have mutated to ignore biological "stop" signals, meaning any drug designed to kill them is likely to poison healthy tissue as well.--------------------------------------------------------------

A breast cancer cell photographed by a scanning electron microscope. The cell's irregular, spiked surface is typical of cancer cells, which undergo massive physical and genetic mutations as they grow uncontrollably. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

This microscopic chaos causes the second major hurdle: tumor heterogeneity. Cancer is an umbrella term for more than 200 distinct conditions, and even within a single tumor, not all cells are identical. As a mass grows, its cells constantly divide and randomly mutate. If a specific chemotherapy drug eliminates 99.9% of a tumor mass, a small fraction of cells may have already developed a random mutation that makes them resistant to that drug. Those survivors multiply, and the disease returns, completely immune to the original treatment.

The idea that the medical field only "slows down" the process is a misconception. Millions of cases are definitively cured each year through surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. When oncologists achieve this, they use the term "complete remission" because it is impossible to be absolutely certain that zero microscopic cancer cells remain hidden in the bone marrow or lungs.

For advanced, metastatic cases, the goal often does shift to slowing the disease.

 Instead of trying to eradicate every rogue cell, which might kill the patient in the process modern medicine increasingly treats advanced cancer as a chronic, manageable illness. 

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which train a patient's own white blood cells to recognize specific mutations, can keep tumors dormant and allow patients to live with the disease for decades.

876 views

View 4 upvotes

Verification of the “Memory Shield” advertisement

 find out  from chat GPT

Verification of the “Memory Shield” advertisement

Thank you for providing the link. One important concern is immediately apparent: 60-minutes.org is not the official CBS 60 Minutes website.

The official CBS 60 Minutes website is cbsnews.com/60-minutes.

That distinction matters because a website can use a name resembling a respected news program to make an advertisement appear more credible.

The link also contains advertising-tracking parameters (rtkcid and rtkcmpid). Those do not prove fraud, but they suggest the page may be part of a marketing campaign.

My preliminary recommendation is not to purchase anything or enter payment information based on this page until its medical claims and seller have been independently verified.

1. What I found on the actual website

I was able to inspect the page. It is selling a product called Cognizil, a memory-support supplement.

60 Minutes

Cognizil — advertised memory supplement

Unverified claims

Prices displayed on the linked advertisement

2 bottles	$158 + $9.99 shipping
3 bottles	$207
6 bottles	$294

The website also advertises a 60-day money-back guarantee and suggests that customers may notice sharper recall and improved focus within days.

60 Minutes

This is a supplement sales page, not a published medical research report.

The page includes testimonials presented as reader comments. However, these do not establish whether the product works, because there is no independent verification of the customers, their diagnoses, or objective memory-test results.

2. Is it a real CBS 60 Minutes investigation?

I found no evidence that CBS 60 Minutes produced or endorsed this Cognizil advertisement.

CBS has published genuine reporting about experimental Alzheimer's treatments. For example, its August 2024 report covered Dr. Ali Rezai's research using focused ultrasound in a very small group of Alzheimer's patients. That was an experimental medical procedure—not an endorsement of a commercial memory supplement.

CBS News

The genuine CBS program is available at CBS News — 60 Minutes.

3. Scientific investigation of Cognizil's ingredients

I found product information describing the following formulation:

• Chromium: 7 micrograms per serving.

• A proprietary blend of 21 ingredients totaling 15.47 milligrams.

• Ingredients include guarana, green tea, ginseng, maca root, amino acids, and botanical extracts.

  Mental Clarity & Memory Support

The important issue is that the manufacturer does not disclose the amount of each ingredient in the proprietary blend.

That makes it difficult to determine whether individual ingredients are present at doses shown to be effective in human clinical studies.

I also found no published randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial demonstrating that the finished Cognizil formula restores memory in people over 60.

4. Safety and medical concerns

Some of the listed ingredients warrant attention:

Ingredient	Potential concern
Guarana and green tea	May contain caffeine, potentially affecting sleep or causing palpitations
Panax ginseng	May interact with medications, including some diabetes medicines
Grapefruit-derived ingredients	Depending on their composition, may interact with certain medications
Multiple botanical extracts	Combined long-term safety is not established for this specific formula

The exact risks depend on actual doses, preparation, other medications, and individual health conditions.

The FDA explains that dietary supplements are not approved for safety and effectiveness before being marketed.

FDA

5. What the NIH says about memory supplements

The National Institute on Aging cautions that over-the-counter products promising sharper memory or dementia prevention may be ineffective, unsafe, or interfere with medical treatments.

National Institute on Aging

Its research summary also states that no vitamin or dietary supplement has been proven to prevent Alzheimer's disease.

National Institute on Aging

Final assessment

Verification question	Finding
Is this the official CBS 60 Minutes website?	No
Is the page selling a supplement?	Yes — Cognizil
Is there verified evidence of CBS endorsement?	Not found
Is there a published clinical trial proving Cognizil restores memory?	Not found
Is Cognizil FDA-approved to treat memory loss?	No
Is long-term safety established for the complete formula?	Not established

My recommendation: Do not buy Cognizil based on this advertisement. The advertised memory-restoration claim is not supported by adequate clinical evidence, and the product's complete long-term safety profile is unclear.

I would also avoid entering personal or credit-card information into the linked sales page.

One final question: Did you only read the advertisement, or did you also enter any personal information or payment details? I ask because I can help you assess the website's cybersecurity and privacy risks as well as its medical claims.

Neurologists: The ”Memory Shield” Brain Trick May Restore Memory After Age 60

find out for me scientific research and report

Scientific Research Report: “Memory Shield” Brain Trick After Age 60

Claim under investigation: “Neurologists: The ‘Memory Shield’ Brain Trick May Restore Memory After Age 60.”

This headline makes a significant medical claim: that a particular technique can restore memory in older adults.

The important scientific distinction is between improving memory performance, slowing cognitive decline, and reversing existing memory loss. These are three different outcomes, and a treatment shown to help one does not necessarily accomplish the others.

I will evaluate the claim against published clinical research, particularly randomized controlled trials, and distinguish established findings from advertising claims.

1. Scientific verdict

The specific “Memory Shield” claim is not scientifically verified.

I could not identify a peer-reviewed clinical trial establishing that a technique called “Memory Shield” restores memory after age 60. The headline alone does not identify the neurologists, intervention, study, or clinical results.

That does not mean all memory exercises are ineffective. It means we should not assume this particular advertised technique works without evidence.

2. What published scientific research actually shows

Research	Findings	Evidence assessment
WHO 2026 guidelines	Cognitive training may produce small improvements in cognitive performance.	Low certainty for cognitive training
ACTIVE clinical trial	Some forms of reasoning and processing-speed training reduced decline in trained abilities over time.	Evidence for specific cognitive benefits, not restored memory
Physical activity research	Regular exercise supports cognitive health and may reduce cognitive decline.	Strong WHO recommendation for adults with normal cognition
Commercial brain-training programs	Benefits may not transfer reliably to everyday memory or prevent dementia.	Insufficient evidence for broad claims

Sources: WHO 2026 clinical recommendations and NIH National Institute on Aging.

NCBI Bookshelf+2

Important research finding

The WHO's 2026 evidence review found that cognitive training may produce a small improvement in cognitive function, but the reviewed evidence did not establish that cognitive training prevents dementia over five years.

NCBI Bookshelf

This is very different from saying a technique can restore memory lost because of Alzheimer's disease or another neurological disorder.

3. What really helps protect memory after age 60?

Based on the scientific evidence, these approaches are more credible than an unverified “brain trick”:

• Regular physical activity: Walking, aerobic exercise, and appropriate strength training.

• Cognitive stimulation: Learning a language, practicing a musical instrument, reading, and engaging in challenging mental activities.

• Cardiovascular health: Managing blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol.

• Healthy sleep and nutrition: Supporting overall brain and metabolic health.

• Hearing and social health: Addressing hearing impairment and maintaining meaningful social engagement.

WHO's updated guidelines support addressing multiple risk factors rather than relying on a single exercise or supplement.

World Health Organization+1

4. Warning signs in the advertisement

I would be especially cautious if the “Memory Shield” presentation:

• Promises to reverse years of memory loss within days.

• Claims that doctors are hiding a simple cure.

• Uses testimonials instead of published clinical trials.

• Refers to neurologists without naming them or their institutions.

• Requires purchasing a supplement, subscription, or secret training program before revealing the method.

These are warning signs, not proof of fraud. The exact advertisement needs to be examined.

5. Scientific conclusion

Memory can sometimes improve after age 60, particularly when difficulties involve sleep problems, medication side effects, depression, or other treatable conditions.

Cognitive training can also improve particular skills.

However, no evidence identified in this review establishes that “Memory Shield” restores memory or reverses Alzheimer's disease.

For new, worsening, or disruptive memory problems, a medical evaluation is important rather than relying on an advertised technique.