Saturday, November 1, 2025

Busted in the ER: Drivers Are Being Arrested for OWI Right from Their Hospital Beds

 This article explains that a person can still be arrested for OWI (Operating While Intoxicated) even if they are taken to the hospital after an accident or medical emergency. Some people think that going to the hospital might protect them from arrest, but the article makes it clear that this is not true. Police can continue their investigation at the hospital, and in many cases, the hospital is where the most important evidence is collected.

The process usually begins when police respond to a crash or when someone is found unconscious or acting impaired behind the wheel. 

If officers notice signs such as

  1.  the smell of alcohol, 
  2. slurred speech, 
  3. bloodshot eyes, or 
  4. if witnesses say the person was driving, this gives probable cause to continue the investigation. 

Under Wisconsin’s implied consent law, simply driving on public roads counts as giving consent to chemical tests such as blood draws. 

This same type of law exists in all 50 states.

The article also explains that hospitals often draw blood for medical treatment, not for police. However, with a search warrant, law enforcement can request those medical blood test results and use them as evidence in court. This is important because hospital blood tests are usually very accurate and can show a person’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of the incident.

In some situations, the police may even arrest someone while they are still in the hospital bed. Officers may wait until medical staff say the person is stable before transporting them to jail. If the person refuses a chemical test, the law can still punish them. 

Refusal can result in automatic license suspension and additional penalties, even if they are not found guilty of OWI later.

The article also mentions legal challenges. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mitchell v. Wisconsin (2019) that unconscious drivers may be subject to blood draws without a warrant in emergency situations. However, courts still continue to review how consent is handled, especially to make sure police are not forcing or misleading people.

Overall, the key point is that going to the hospital does not prevent OWI charges. In fact, the hospital may make the case stronger because blood tests and observations are recorded clearly. This article serves as a reminder of the serious legal and personal consequences of driving while intoxicated.

Busted in the ER: Drivers Are Being Arrested for OWI Right from Their Hospital Beds

4 days ago

Yes — you can absolutely be arrested for OWI (Operating While Intoxicated) even if you’re in a hospital. Here’s how it typically plays out:

AI was utilized for research, writing, citation management, and editing.
The author has no affiliation with any companies mentioned.


๐Ÿšจ How Hospital OWI Arrests Work

๐Ÿš‘ Police Respond to an Accident or Medical Call

If you were in a crash or found slumped over behind the wheel, officers may follow you to the hospital. Wisconsin law — like most states — allows OWI investigations to continue even during medical treatment.

๐Ÿ•ต️ Probable Cause Comes First

Officers must have probable cause — such as the odor of alcohol, slurred speech, or witness reports that you were driving.

Under Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law (Wis. Stat. § 343.305), by driving on state roads, you’ve already consented to a chemical test.

Police can request a blood draw even while you’re hospitalized.

If you’re unconscious, the law presumes consent in most cases — though this was limited by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in State v. Prado (2021), which ruled the incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional.

All 50 states have some form of implied consent law.

๐Ÿงช Medical Blood Draws Can Be Used as Evidence

Hospitals often draw blood for medical reasons, not law enforcement. However, with a warrant, police can obtain those lab results and use them in court.

๐Ÿ›️ Formal Arrest Can Happen at the Hospital

If officers have probable cause, they can arrest you bedside — even while you’re in a hospital gown or connected to IVs. They’ll often wait until medical staff clear you for discharge before transporting you to jail.

๐Ÿšซ Refusal = Separate Penalty

Refusing a chemical test in Wisconsin triggers automatic license suspension and can result in enhanced penalties, even if you’re not convicted of OWI.

⚖️ Constitutional Challenges

  • The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin’s law in Mitchell v. Wisconsin (2019), ruling that unconscious drivers may be subject to blood draws without a warrant under the exigent circumstances exception.
  • However, courts continue to scrutinize how consent is obtained — especially in cases involving coercion or misleading statements by officers.

๐Ÿงพ Key Takeaway

You can’t “avoid” an OWI arrest by ending up in the ER. In fact, the hospital is often where evidence is gathered — through blood alcohol tests and police interviews.

California members of transnational fraud ring arrested for $30 Million timeshare scam

 This article reports on a major federal criminal case in which more than 20 individuals were arrested across the United States for their involvement in a large-scale telemarketing fraud and money laundering scheme. The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that these arrests were made as part of Operation Silver Shores, which targeted a transnational criminal organization operating in both the United States and Latin America. The group is accused of stealing more than $30 million from mostly elderly people across the country.

The article explains that the accused individuals carried out their fraud by contacting victims through phone calls and emails. They pretended to be lawyers, government officials, or representatives from legal agencies. Many of the targeted victims were senior citizens who either owned or previously owned timeshare properties. The scammers told the victims that they qualified for financial settlements related to their timeshares. This false promise of compensation made victims believe that the callers were helping them, when in fact they were tricking them.

The scheme involved several organized and coordinated steps to move and hide the stolen money. The group created shell companies, fake business identities, and fraudulent bank accounts in order to transfer money without raising suspicion. They also used layered transfers, meaning that they moved money through multiple accounts and financial platforms to make it harder for investigators to trace the funds. Some of the money was transferred to accounts in the United States, while other funds were sent to foreign countries in Latin America. This shows that the organization was not only large but also global and well-structured.

The DOJ reported that at least 372 victims have been identified so far. The financial losses were described as devastating, especially because many of the victims were elderly and may not be able to recover financially. Some victims may have lost their retirement savings or life savings to the scheme. Federal investigators were able to recover over $1.5 million, but most of the stolen money is still unaccounted for and efforts to recover more funds are ongoing.

The article also lists the names, ages, and cities of several individuals who were arrested. These include people from California cities such as Berkeley, Marysville, Stockton, San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, and Fremont, as well as individuals from Texas and Florida. These arrests show that the criminal activity was spread across multiple states and involved many different participants.

Those who were arrested are charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, which are serious federal crimes. Wire fraud involves using electronic communication, such as email or phone calls, to commit fraud. Money laundering involves hiding the source of illegally obtained money by passing it through complicated financial transactions. If found guilty, each defendant could face up to 30 years in prison and heavy fines for wire fraud. Money laundering charges could lead to an additional 20 years in prison and fines that could be as large as the amount of money stolen.

The article also notes that the defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court. This is an important part of the American legal system, which requires that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before someone is convicted.

This case raises awareness about fraud and scams, especially those targeting the elderly. Many elderly people are trusting, and scammers take advantage of that trust. The article highlights the need for people to be cautious when receiving phone calls, emails, or messages about money, prizes, or legal settlements. It also emphasizes the need for families and communities to help protect vulnerable individuals, such as older adults, from being tricked or pressured into sending money.

Operation Silver Shores also shows the importance of cooperation between federal agencies and international law enforcement partners. Because the crime involved people and accounts in multiple countries, investigators had to work across borders to uncover the scheme.

In conclusion, this article illustrates a serious crime that caused significant financial harm to many innocent people. It also shows how modern scams can be complex and highly coordinated. The arrests represent an important step toward justice for the victims, but the emotional and financial damage may be long-lasting. The case serves as a strong reminder to stay alert and to question unexpected financial claims, no matter how professional or convincing they may seem.

แ€’ီแ€†ောแ€„်းแ€•ါးแ€™ှာ แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€แ€”်แ€ောแ€„်แ€žူแ€€ြီးแ€›ုံး DOJ แ€€ แ€•ြแ€”်แ€€ြားแ€žแ€œို၊ แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€แ€”်แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€„ံแ€แ€…်แ€œွှားแ€™ှာ แ€œူ แ‚แ€แ€€ျော်แ€€ို แ€–แ€™်းแ€†ီးแ€ဲ့แ€แ€š်แ€œို့ แ€กแ€€ြောแ€„်းแ€•ြแ€‘ားแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€žူแ€ို့แ€Ÿာ Operation Silver Shores แ€œို့แ€ေါ်แ€ဲ့ แ€ားแ€†ီးแ€›ေး แ€กแ€œုแ€•်แ€œုแ€•်แ€ြแ€„်းแ€กောแ€€်แ€™ှာ แ€–แ€™်းแ€†ီးแ€ျုแ€•်แ€‘ားแ€ာแ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ြီး แ€’ီแ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€Ÿာ แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€แ€”်แ€”ဲ့ แ€œแ€€်แ€แ€„်แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€ แ€€ျောแ€€်แ€ောแ€„်แ€แ€ျို့แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€„ံแ€ွေแ€‘ဲแ€™ှာ แ€œုแ€•်แ€„แ€”်းแ€™ျားแ€•ြားแ€ဲ့แ€ဲ့ แ€€แ€™္แ€˜ာแ€œုံးแ€†ိုแ€„်แ€›ာ แ€œိแ€™်แ€€ြေးแ€›ုံးแ€–ော်แ€กแ€–ွဲ့ แ€แ€…်แ€ုแ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€’ီแ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€€ แ€กแ€‘แ€„်แ€กแ€›ှား แ€กแ€žแ€€်แ€€ြီးแ€žူแ€ွေแ€€ို (elderly) แ€†ိုးแ€›ွแ€š်แ€ျိုးแ€–ောแ€€်แ€•ြီး แ€žแ€”်းแ€™ျားแ€”ှแ€„့်แ€ျီแ€ဲ့ แ€„ွေแ€ွေแ€€ို แ€ိုးแ€šူแ€ဲ့แ€ာแ€œို့ แ€†ိုแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€…ုแ€…ုแ€•ေါแ€„်း $30 million (แƒแ€ แ€žแ€”်းแ€’ေါ်แ€œာ) แ€œောแ€€်แ€•แ€™ာแ€แ€›ှိแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€†ိုแ€œိုแ€ာแ€€ แ€žူแ€ို့แ€Ÿာ แ€–ုแ€”်းแ€”ဲ့ Email แ€ွေแ€”ဲ့ แ€žแ€်แ€™ှแ€်แ€‘ားแ€ဲ့ แ€žแ€€်แ€€ြီးแ€›ွแ€š်แ€กိုแ€ွေแ€€ို แ€†แ€€်แ€žွแ€š်แ€•ြီး แ€•ြแ€Š်แ€”แ€š်แ€กိုแ€„်แ€šာแ€”ီ၊ แ€ฅแ€•แ€’ေแ€แ€”်แ€‘แ€™်း၊ แ€แ€›ားแ€›ုံးแ€›ှေ့แ€”ေ แ€…แ€ဲ့ แ€•ုံแ€…ံแ€ွေแ€”ဲ့ แ€ျားแ€šူแ€•ြောแ€†ိုแ€ဲ့แ€€ြแ€ာแ€•ါ။ แ€ก victims แ€™ျားแ€‘ဲแ€€ แ€กแ€™ျားแ€…ုแ€€ timeshare property (แ€•ိုแ€„်แ€†ိုแ€„်แ€™ှုแ€•ုံแ€…ံแ€แ€…်แ€™ျိုး) แ€•ိုแ€„်แ€žူแ€ွေ แ€–ြแ€…်แ€€ြแ€•ြီး แ€žူแ€ို့แ€€ို “แ€žแ€„်แ€ို့แ€›ဲ့ แ€•ိုแ€„်แ€†ိုแ€„်แ€™ှုแ€”ဲ့แ€•แ€်แ€žแ€€်แ€•ြီး แ€ฅแ€•แ€’ေแ€”ှောแ€„့်แ€”ှေးแ€™ှု၊ แ€…ီแ€…แ€‰်แ€„ွေแ€•ြแ€”်แ€œာแ€›แ€™แ€š့် แ€แ€›ားแ€œျှောแ€€်แ€™ှုแ€ွေแ€›ှိแ€แ€š်၊ แ€กแ€…ိုးแ€›แ€€ แ€„ွေแ€•ြแ€”်แ€•ေးแ€™แ€š့်แ€กแ€ွแ€€် แ€žแ€„် processing fees แ€•ေးแ€–ို့แ€œိုแ€แ€š်” แ€œို့ แ€žုံးแ€”แ€Š်းแ€œှแ€Š့်แ€…ားแ€ဲ့แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€’ီแ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€Ÿာ shell companies (แ€กแ€™แ€Š်แ€›ှိแ€•ေแ€™แ€š့် แ€กแ€œုแ€•်แ€™แ€›ှိแ€ဲ့ แ€€ုแ€™္แ€•แ€ီแ€‚ိုးแ€žေแ€™ျား)၊ fake business names แ€”ဲ့ bank accounts แ€ို့แ€กแ€žုံးแ€•ြုแ€•ြီး victims แ€ွေแ€›ဲ့ แ€„ွေแ€€ို แ€ြောแ€€်แ€‘แ€•်แ€”ှแ€„့်แ€แ€ျို့แ€กแ€€ွဲแ€กแ€žွားแ€”แ€Š်းแ€”ဲ့ แ€œွှဲแ€•ြောแ€„်းแ€•ြီး แ€™ူแ€œแ€™ူแ€€ြแ€™်း แ€€ိုแ€–ုံးแ€€ွแ€š်แ€ဲ့แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€„ွေแ€ွေแ€€ို แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€แ€”်၊ แ€œแ€€်แ€แ€„်แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€ แ€”ဲ့ แ€กแ€ြားแ€”ိုแ€„်แ€„ံแ€ွေแ€›ှိ แ€žူแ€ို့แ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€แ€„်แ€€ောแ€„်แ€ာแ€ွေแ€‘ဲแ€€ို แ€œှแ€™်းแ€œှแ€™်းแ€›ွှแ€™်းแ€›ွှแ€™်း layered transfers แ€œုแ€•်แ€•ြီး แ€ြေแ€›ာแ€›ှแ€„်းแ€œแ€„်းแ€…ေแ€ဲ့แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

DOJ แ€•ြောแ€€ြားแ€ျแ€€်แ€กแ€› 372 victims แ€‘แ€•်แ€™ံแ€ွေ့แ€›ှိแ€‘ားแ€•ြီး, แ€”ောแ€€်แ€‘แ€•်แ€œူแ€ွေแ€œแ€Š်း แ€‘แ€•်แ€ွေ့แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€แ€š်แ€œို့ แ€šူแ€†แ€”ေแ€€ြแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€กแ€ုแ€ျိแ€”်แ€™ှာ $1.5 million แ€œောแ€€်แ€€ို แ€•ြแ€”်แ€œแ€Š်แ€–ော်แ€‘ုแ€်แ€›แ€šူแ€‘ားแ€”ိုแ€„်แ€•ြီး แ€€ျแ€”်แ€•ိုแ€„်းแ€กแ€€ြောแ€„်းแ€€ြားแ€กแ€”ေแ€กแ€‘ားแ€”ဲ့ แ€…ုံแ€…แ€™်းแ€†ဲแ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€–แ€™်းแ€†ီးแ€‘ားแ€ဲ့แ€œူแ€ွေแ€‘ဲแ€€ แ€กแ€™ျားแ€…ုแ€Ÿာ California, Texas, Florida แ€…แ€ဲ့ แ€•ြแ€Š်แ€”แ€š်แ€ွေแ€€แ€”ေ แ€–แ€™်းแ€†ီးแ€‘ားแ€ာแ€•ါ။ แ€žူแ€ို့แ€‘ဲแ€™ှာ Berkeley, Marysville, Stockton, San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, Fremont แ€…แ€ဲ့ แ€™ြို့แ€ွေแ€€แ€”ေ แ€ျုแ€•်แ€‘ားแ€žူแ€ွေแ€œแ€Š်း แ€•ါแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€žူแ€ို့แ€€ို แ€…ွဲแ€ျแ€€်แ€แ€„်แ€‘ားแ€ဲ့ แ€กแ€™ှုแ€€ wire fraud (แ€™ူแ€€ြแ€™်းแ€…แ€”แ€…်แ€”ဲ့ แ€ိုးแ€šူแ€ြแ€„်း) แ€”ဲ့ money laundering (แ€™ူแ€œแ€กแ€…แ€…်แ€กแ€™ှแ€”် แ€„ွေแ€€ို แ€–ုံးแ€€ွแ€š်แ€•ြောแ€„်းแ€œဲแ€žုံးแ€ြแ€„်း) แ€•ါ။ แ€’ီแ€”ှแ€…်แ€ုแ€œုံးแ€Ÿာ แ€•ြแ€„်းแ€‘แ€”်แ€ဲ့ แ€•ုแ€’်แ€™แ€ွေ แ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ြီး แ€‘แ€„်แ€›ှားแ€ဲ့ แ€–แ€€်แ€’แ€›แ€š်แ€•ြแ€…်แ€™ှုแ€™ျား แ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€แ€…်แ€šောแ€€်แ€ျแ€„်းแ€…ီแ€€ို แ€กแ€•ြแ€…်แ€€ွာแ€ြားแ€™ှုแ€กแ€•ေါ်แ€™ူแ€แ€Š်แ€•ြီး แ€€ြားแ€™แ€™ျားแ€ဲ့ 30 แ€”ှแ€…်แ€กแ€‘ိ แ€–ျော်แ€–ြေแ€›ိုแ€„်းแ€…ွแ€•်แ€ြแ€„်း, แ€”ှแ€„့် แ€กแ€™ျားแ€€ြီးแ€žော แ€’ေါ်แ€œာ $250,000 แ€’แ€်แ€€ြေးแ€ွေแ€€ိုแ€ျแ€™ှแ€်แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ Money laundering แ€กแ€™ှုแ€ွေแ€€ 20 แ€”ှแ€…်แ€‘แ€•်แ€ိုးแ€”ိုแ€„်แ€•ြီး แ€šแ€„်းแ€„ွေแ€แ€”်แ€–ိုးแ€”ှแ€…်แ€† แ€•ြแ€”်แ€€ောแ€€်แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€žို့แ€žော် แ€žแ€€်แ€žေแ€•ြ แ€™แ€•ြီးแ€™แ€ျแ€„်း, แ€ฅแ€•แ€’ေแ€กแ€› แ€žူแ€ို့แ€กားแ€œုံး “แ€žแ€€်แ€žေแ€™แ€•ြုแ€™แ€ျแ€„်း แ€กแ€•ြแ€…်แ€™แ€›ှိแ€žူ” แ€Ÿု แ€žแ€်แ€™ှแ€်แ€›แ€•ါแ€žแ€Š်။ แ€กแ€™ေแ€›ိแ€€แ€”် แ€แ€›ားแ€›ေးแ€…แ€”แ€…်แ€€ แ€กแ€€ြောแ€„်းแ€•ြแ€ျแ€€်แ€กแ€› “innocent until proven guilty” แ€†ိုแ€ဲ့ แ€…แ€Š်းแ€™ျแ€‰်းแ€กแ€ိုแ€„်း แ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€’ီแ€กแ€™ှုแ€€ แ€กแ€žแ€€်แ€€ြီးแ€žူแ€ွေแ€‘ဲแ€™ှာ แ€กแ€”္แ€แ€›ာแ€š်แ€ွေ แ€˜แ€š်แ€œောแ€€်แ€™ျားแ€”ေแ€€ြောแ€„်း แ€€ို แ€•ြแ€žแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€กแ€‘ူးแ€žแ€–ြแ€„့် แ€–ုแ€”်းแ€ေါ်แ€…แ€€ား၊ Email scam แ€ွေแ€Ÿာ แ€šแ€”ေ့แ€กแ€ျိแ€”်แ€™ှာ แ€กแ€œွแ€”်แ€”ူးแ€Šံ့แ€•ြီး แ€•ြแ€Š်แ€ွแ€„်းแ€”ဲ့ แ€•ြแ€Š်แ€•แ€€ แ€…แ€”แ€…်แ€แ€€ျแ€œှုแ€•်แ€›ှားแ€œာ แ€•ြီးแ€žားแ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€กိแ€™်แ€‘ောแ€„်แ€…ုแ€ွေแ€€แ€•ါ แ€žူแ€ို့แ€›ဲ့ แ€กแ€–ိုးแ€กแ€–ွားแ€ွေ၊ แ€™ိแ€˜แ€ွေแ€›ဲ့ แ€œုံแ€ြုံแ€™ှု แ€€ို แ€‚แ€›ုแ€•ြုแ€–ို့แ€œိုแ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€กောแ€„်แ€™ြแ€„်แ€ဲ့ แ€–แ€™်းแ€†ီးแ€™ှုแ€ွေแ€Ÿာ แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€„ံแ€กแ€ွแ€„်း၊ แ€”ိုแ€„်แ€„ံแ€ြား แ€แ€›ားแ€žแ€™ားแ€™ျား แ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€กแ€…แ€Š်းแ€ွေ แ€•ူးแ€•ေါแ€„်းแ€œုแ€•်แ€†ောแ€„်แ€ြแ€„်းแ€กแ€ွแ€€် แ€žแ€€်แ€žေแ€กแ€…แ€…်แ€แ€…်แ€ု แ€–ြแ€…်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။ แ€’ါแ€€ แ€แ€›ားแ€›ုံးแ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€กแ€…แ€Š်းแ€ွေแ€›ဲ့ แ€กแ€œုแ€•်แ€กแ€€ျိုးแ€กแ€™ြแ€် แ€กแ€› แ€กแ€›ေးแ€€ြီးแ€•ြီး แ€กောแ€„်แ€™ြแ€„်แ€™ှုแ€แ€…်แ€ု แ€œို့ แ€•ြောแ€”ိုแ€„်แ€•ါแ€แ€š်။

แ€กแ€€ျแ€‰်းแ€ျုแ€•်แ€›แ€›แ€„်—

✔ แ€กแ€–ွဲ့แ€€ แ€กแ€žแ€€်แ€€ြီးแ€žူแ€ွေแ€€ို Scam แ€œုแ€•်แ€ဲ့แ€žแ€Š်
✔ $30 million แ€ျီแ€žော แ€„ွေแ€†ုံးแ€›ှုံးแ€™ှုแ€›ှိแ€žแ€Š်
✔ 372 victims แ€กแ€‘แ€€်แ€›ှိแ€žแ€Š်


https://local.newsbreak.com/the-hd-post-1600837/4307289373867-california-members-of-transnational-fraud-ring-arrested-for-30-million-timeshare-scam

CALIFORNIA – The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced October 21 that more than 20 members of a transnational criminal organization were arrested across the U.S., including in California, Texas, and Florida, on charges of wire fraud and money laundering.

“The indictment announced today exposes a telemarketing scam that deliberately targeted our vulnerable elderly citizens and yielded more than $30 million in devastating financial losses to victims across the country,” U.S. attorney Eric Grant said.

Court documents show that Operation Silver Shores, targeting a transnational fraud ring in the U.S. and Latin America, led to 15 arrests of individuals accused of stealing from mostly elderly Americans.

Members of the criminal ring contacted victims via phone and email, posing as attorneys and government officials.

Many victims, current or former timeshare owners, were told they were entitled to money from legal settlements related to their properties.

The group used multiple tactics to defraud victims.

They used a web of shell companies, fake business names, and accounts to launder money from victims. The defendants used layered transactions to move victims’ money to co-conspirators while obscuring its origin.

The defendants transferred fraud proceeds to accounts controlled by members in the U.S., Latin America, and beyond.

Investigators have identified over 372 victims

The group evaded banks’ anti-money laundering and KYC rules by misrepresenting the true purpose of their activities. They lied to banks about the nature of the transactions.

The defendants funneled funds through fintechs, crypto exchanges, and smaller banks with lax AML/KYC safeguards.

Authorities say the scheme has affected over 372 victims, with losses exceeding $30 million. So far, investigators have seized more than $1.5 million in victim funds and continue to recover additional assets.

Arrested individuals

The following were arrested on charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering:

  • Piera Salgado Teleki, 34, of Berkeley, Calif.
  • Maira Liset Chavez, 36, of Marysville, Calif.
  • Sergio Madrigal Lacayo Jr., 39, of Stockton, Calif.
  • Celina Martinez, 44, of San Jose, Calif.
  • Ashley Molina, 32, of Amarillo, Texas.
  • Carlos Zamora, 40, of Port Saint Lucie, Florida.
  • Stephanie Alonzo, 42, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Ricardo Plascencia, 32, of Amarillo, Texas.
  • Samuel Lopez, 45, of Amarillo, Texas.
  • Veronica Puentes, 40, of Port Saint Lucie, Florida.

Additional California residents arrested face federal charges related to wire fraud and money laundering, along with other counts.

  • Antonio Palafox Aguilar, 33, Fresno
  • Felix Alejandro, 39, Bakersfield (currently at UPS Florence-High)
  • Alejandro Cuarenta, 33, Bakersfield
  • Jennifer Magana, 29, Fresno
  • Anthony Chavez, 27, Fremont

Defendants face up to 30 years in prison

If convicted, the defendants face up to 30 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

Money laundering convictions carry up to 20 years in prison and fines of $500,000 or twice the property value, whichever is higher.

The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

In WWI, France started to build a fake Paris to confuse German bombers.

  Just after noon on August 30, 1914, about a month into World War I, a biplane marked with the German iron cross under its wings flew 6,00...